Classic responsive design cuts the web into steps: a mobile version, a tablet one, a desktop one. In between, the site jumps from one stair to the next. Text that suddenly grows, a grid that reorganises abruptly. What you actually maintain is three layouts. And three chances to break something.
Fluid, or continuous
A fluid site has no versions. It adapts continuously, from the smallest screen to the largest, with no stairs. Text, margins and images grow together, at the right speed. clamp() and container queries made that possible without JavaScript.
What the eye does not see but feels
Good fluid work goes unnoticed, and that is the point. No jump betrays a change of format, no area breaks at a forgotten width. On any phone, tablet or work screen, the proportions stay right. Nobody will ever congratulate this work, since it consists precisely in there being nothing to notice. I still hold it to be the strongest UX there is: you stop thinking about the device, you read.
Three widths were drawn, and the whole rest of the axis ships without anyone ever having looked at it.
Less code, better holding
Three mockups means three times the design, build and testing work. One fluid scale, set once, covers the whole range. Fewer breakpoints, fewer rules, fewer edge cases dragging bugs along for years.
The same three jobs, redone for every mockup on one side, set down once on the other.
Three versions means three times the risk. EVA CSS turns it into a method: this site has a single width media query. The detailed figures are in two other notes: What responsive still costs and The old dream of fluid CSS.